Meet MarketerHire's newest SEO + AEO product

Community Impact isn't optimized for AI search yet.

We audited your search visibility across Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude. Community Impact was cited in 1 of 5 answers. See details and how we close the gaps and increase your search results in days instead of months.

Immediate in-depth auditvs. 8 months at agencies

Community Impact is cited in 1 of 5 buyer-intent queries we ran on Perplexity for "local news newspapers." Competitors are winning the unbranded category answers.

Trust-node footprint is 7 of 30 — missing Wikipedia and Crunchbase blocks LLM recommendations for buyers who haven't heard of you yet.

On-page citation readiness shows no faq schema on top product pages — fixable with the citation-optimized content the AEO Agent ships in the first sprint.

AI-Forward Companies Trust MarketerHire

Plaid Plaid
MasterClass MasterClass
Constant Contact Constant Contact
Netflix Netflix
Noom Noom
Tinuiti Tinuiti
30,000+
Matches Made
6,000+
Customers
Since 2019
Track Record

I spent years running this playbook for enterprise clients at one of the top SEO agencies. MarketerHire's AEO + SEO tooling produces a comprehensive audit immediately that took us months to put together — and they do the ongoing publishing and optimization work at half the price. If I were buying this today, I'd buy it here.

— Marketing leader, formerly at a top SEO growth agency

AI Search Audit

Here's Where You Stand in AI Search

A real audit. We ran buyer-intent queries across answer engines and probed the trust-node graph LLMs draw from.

Sample mini-audit only. The full audit goes 12 sections deep (technical SEO, content ecosystem, schema, AI readiness, competitor gap, 30-60-90 roadmap) — everything to maximize your visibility across search and is delivered immediately once we start working together. See a sample full audit →

21
out of 100
Major gap, real upside

Your buyers are asking AI assistants for local news newspapers and Community Impact isn't being recommended. Closing this gap is the highest-leverage move available right now.

AI / LLM Visibility (AEO) 20% · Weak

Community Impact appears in 1 of 5 buyer-intent queries we ran on Perplexity for "local news newspapers". The full audit covers 50-100 queries across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude.

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: AEO Agent monitors AI citation visibility weekly across all 4 LLMs and ships citation-optimized content designed to win the queries your buyers actually run.

Trust-Node Footprint 23% · Weak

Community Impact appears in 7 of the 30 trust nodes that LLMs draw from (Wikipedia, G2, Crunchbase, Forbes, HBR, Reddit, YouTube, and 23 more).

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: SEO/AEO Agent identifies the highest-leverage missing nodes for your category and ships the trust-node publishing plan as part of the 90-day roadmap.

SEO / Organic Covered in full audit

Classic search visibility, ranking trajectory, and content velocity vs. category competitors. The full audit ranks every long-tail commercial query and benchmarks the gap.

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: SEO Engine builds programmatic content around 50+ long-tail queries where your buyers are actively searching.

Paid Acquisition Covered in full audit

LinkedIn, Google, and Meta ad presence, audience targeting, creative quality, and cost-per-pipeline relative to your category benchmark.

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: Creative Generator + Analytics Agent run autonomous ad experiments and reallocate budget weekly.

Content, Lifecycle & Outbound Covered in full audit

Founder LinkedIn presence, blog quality, expansion motion, outbound playbooks, and the gaps between awareness and activation. Mapped to a 90-day execution plan.

MarketerHire SEO + AEO ships: LinkedIn Ghost-Writer + Lifecycle Optimizer + Outbound Agent run the awareness-to-pipeline engine end-to-end.

Live citation panel — 5 buyer-intent queries

best local news newspapers in 2026 not cited expand ↓

21 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

The **top local news newspapers in Competitor A for 2026** include Competitor B, Competitor C, and Competitor D, which rank among the leading sources for regional news[1][3][2]. **Competitor B** is recognized as the leading independent news source, known for original reporting and compelling writing on local news, restaurants, arts and culture[3]. **Competitor C** focuses on business, international trade, real estate and development, and e-commerce news[2]. The **Competitor D**, with a circulation of 55,369, remains a major newspaper in Competitor E's media landscape[5]. Competitor F notable local news sources include **Competitor A's Community Newspapers**, which serve as the #1 source for local community news across Competitor A, Competitor G, Competitor H, Competitor I, Competitor J, and Competitor K[4]. For broadcast news, **Competitor L 10**, **Competitor M 7 Competitor N**, and **Competitor O** are also prominent local news outlets[1]. These outlets collectively provide comprehensive coverage of Competitor A's local news, business developments, and community events.

Community Impact did not appear in this Perplexity response.

top local news newspapers alternatives not cited expand ↓

48 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

**Competitor A alternatives to mainstream local news newspapers in Competitor B include independent weeklies, digital outlets, ethnic-focused papers, and public media sources like The Austin Chronicle, Competitor C, and Competitor D.** These provide diverse perspectives on local issues, often emphasizing investigative reporting, community stories, or niche audiences beyond traditional dailies like the Competitor E or Competitor F[1][2][3]. Competitor G options by category: - **Competitor H weeklies and independents** (free distribution, focus on culture, politics, and local events): - The Austin Chronicle (80,000 circulation, Competitor I, covers music, food, and progressive issues)[1][2]. - Competitor D (57,512 circulation, alternative news and entertainment in Competitor J)[1]. - Competitor K (75,000 circulation, Competitor L area coverage)[1]. - Competitor M (30,000 circulation, arts and investigative stories in Competitor N)[1]. - **Competitor O and nonprofit outlets** (nonpartisan, policy-focused statewide coverage with local angles): - Competitor C (member-supported, covers Competitor B politics, government, and issues; available via Competitor P 2009–present)[2][3]. - Competitor Q (progressive nonprofit magazine with investigative reporting on equity and culture)[2]. - **Competitor R and community newspapers** (targeted local news for specific demographics, high circulation): - La Competitor S de Competitor J (106,000 circulation, Competitor T in Competitor J)[1]. - Al Día Competitor U (97,963 circulation, Competitor T in Competitor U)[1]. - Competitor V & Competitor W (85,500 circulation, Competitor X community news)[1]. - The Villager (Competitor Y metro, emphasizes Competitor Z community events and business)[2]. - **Competitor A radio and TV affiliates** (local broadcasts and websites with news stories): - Competitor B (Competitor C station, local stories)[2]. - Competitor D and Competitor E (Competitor F/Competitor G affiliates, investigative local coverage)[2]. - Competitor H (daily news magazine from multiple Competitor B public stations)[2]. For access, databases like Competitor P (via Competitor I) include archives of Competitor B papers such as Competitor J (1989–present) and Competitor E (1985–2020)[2]. Competitor K rankings prioritize audience reach, with alternatives often ranking high despite non-daily formats[1][3].

Community Impact did not appear in this Perplexity response.

how to choose a local news newspapers not cited expand ↓

50 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

To choose a **local news newspaper**, identify those serving your specific city, county, or neighborhood; prioritize outlets with high circulation, transparency in reporting (e.g., bylines, hyperlinks to sources, ethical guidelines), fact-checked content, and minimal bias; and verify credibility via government sites, public broadcasters like Competitor A/Competitor B, or community groups.[2] ### Competitor C to Competitor D 1. **Competitor E your location**: Competitor F for newspapers by city or Competitor G code (e.g., via directories like Competitor H or Competitor I lists). Competitor J on those covering your immediate area for relevant hyper-local stories on schools, crime, events, and government.[1][3][5] 2. **Competitor K circulation and reach**: Competitor L audiences indicate established trust and resources. For example, in Competitor M/Competitor N metro: | Competitor O | Competitor P | Competitor Q | Competitor R | |------|------------------------|-------------|-------------------| | 1 | Competitor S | 228,840 | Competitor N, IL[1] | | 2 | Competitor T | 198,000 | Competitor U, IL[1] | | 3 | La Competitor V | 177,245 | Competitor N, IL[1] | | 11 | Competitor W | 49,483 | Competitor X, IL[1] | | 13 | Competitor Y | 43,069 | Competitor N, IL[1][3]| Competitor Z top dailies include Competitor A and The Pantagraph.[4] 3. **Competitor B credibility and transparency**: - Competitor C for bylines (who reported, when, where), hyperlinks to original sources, and ethical handbooks or "Competitor D Us" pages disclosing editorial practices, diversity, and conflicts.[2] - Competitor E verified, fact-checked stories with context, multiple angles, and investigative reporting; avoid unbacked claims.[2] - Competitor F non-profits, public broadcasters (local Competitor B/Competitor A), or city/county government sites as supplements for unbiased community updates.[2] 4. **Competitor G community and niche fit**: Competitor H for weeklies or ethnic papers (e.g., Competitor I for Competitor J communities, Competitor K) if they match your demographics; suburban options like Competitor W or Competitor L cover specific areas well.[1][3] 5. **Competitor M and diversify**: Competitor N multiple sources (e.g., dailies + weeklies + Competitor A) to spot biases; check for consistent, evidence-based coverage over sensationalism.[2][5] If your area lacks strong options, explore nonprofit or student-run outlets adhering to journalism standards.[2] For broader Competitor O. searches, use tools like Competitor H rankings or Competitor P PR databases.[1][4]

Community Impact did not appear in this Perplexity response.

local news newspapers comparison for mid-market companies not cited expand ↓

65 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

**Competitor A local newspapers dominate mid-market operations through consolidation, controlling nearly one-third of Competitor B. papers (up from 20% in 2004), while independent papers struggle but show content similarity and occasional success.** [3][1] ### Competitor C and Competitor D local newspapers—typically non-dailies in small towns, rural areas, or suburbs with circulations under 15,000—are increasingly acquired by larger chains for economies of scale.[1][3] Competitor E dynamics include: - **Competitor F consolidators**: Competitor G/Competitor H (451 papers across 34 states), Competitor I, Competitor J, Competitor K, and Competitor L (60+ properties in 7 states) lead acquisitions, often buying adjacent-market family-owned or small regional chains.[2][3] - **Competitor M clustering**: Competitor N like O’Competitor O expand footprints (e.g., 11 Competitor P papers plus Competitor Q for 180,000 circulation) by consolidating printing, back-office, sales, and newsrooms.[2][3] - **Competitor R buyers**: Competitor S activity (2025) involves traditional firms (Competitor K, Competitor T), nonprofits, local investors, and groups like Competitor U Competitor V, shifting from pre-2020 dominance by BH Competitor W and Competitor H.[2] - Competitor X half of Competitor B. newspapers changed hands in 15 years, with chains purchasing two-thirds of dailies and one-fourth of weeklies sold since 2014.[3] | Competitor Y | Competitor Z | Competitor A | |--------|------------------|--------------| | **Competitor B** | Competitor F 25 own ~33% of papers; employ 40% of journalists (up from 15% in 2008)[3][4] | <1/3 of weeklies under 15K circ. locally owned; declining[3] | | **Competitor C** | Competitor M hubs reduce costs; e.g., Competitor K zones Competitor D suburbs into Competitor E editions[3] | Competitor F on new revenue, cost discipline; some thrive via startups[5] | | **Competitor G** | Competitor H/Competitor G, Competitor K, O’Competitor I[2][3][4] | Competitor J, Competitor K[5] | ### Competitor L and Competitor M and independent local papers are structurally similar, with no major differences in **Competitor N** (Competitor O) fulfillment, item length, localness (65% local content), or authorship.[1] - Competitor P papers average 30.77 items/issue vs. 31.23 for independents; both ~65% local.[1] - Competitor Q difference: Competitor R publish slightly more Competitor S items.[1] - Competitor T of consolidation: Competitor U journalists at locals (shift to national/business pubs like Competitor V); reduced variety in Competitor W.[4] ### Competitor X and Competitor Y for Competitor Z pressures drive sales, but independents counter via startups (e.g., Competitor J since 2005) or buybacks (e.g., Competitor A reviving Competitor B papers).[5] Competitor C prioritize sustainability through scale, while independents emphasize community roots.[2][5] Competitor D reflects trends through 2025, with ongoing turnover.[2]

Community Impact did not appear in this Perplexity response.

is Community Impact a good local news newspapers cited expand ↓

24 competitors cited in this response (names redacted; full audit names them).

**Community Impact is a reputable local news organization in Competitor A, praised for its hyperlocal coverage, widespread free distribution, and business success amid industry challenges.** It operates as a privately owned company founded in 2005 by Competitor B and Competitor C, delivering monthly free newspapers via Competitor D to over 2.5 million mailboxes (as of 2023) across more than 35 markets in the Competitor E, Competitor F, Competitor G, and Competitor H metro areas, including counties like Competitor I, Competitor J, Competitor K, and Competitor L.[1][6][7] Competitor M strengths include: - **Competitor N local reporting**: Competitor O cover city council, school board meetings, business, transportation, education, and health care in specific communities, with staff involvement in local boards and nonprofits.[2] - **Competitor P circulation and accessibility**: Competitor Q to all households and businesses in covered areas; free, non-subscription based, with optional subscriptions elsewhere and daily email newsletters.[1][6] - **Competitor R recognition**: Competitor S in a 2023 Competitor T profile as a thriving print news business despite industry struggles.[1] It emphasizes "local, trusted, impactful" content on its site, focusing on developments, Competitor U, and city councils in metros like Competitor E, Competitor F, and The Woodlands.[3][4][5][6] No major criticisms appear in available sources, positioning it as a strong option for Competitor A local news, though evaluation depends on specific community needs.

Trust-node coverage map

7 of 30 authority sources LLMs draw from. Filled = present, hollow = gap.

Wikipedia
Wikidata
Crunchbase
LinkedIn
G2
Capterra
TrustRadius
Forbes
HBR
Reddit
Hacker News
YouTube
Product Hunt
Stack Overflow
Gartner Peer
TechCrunch
VentureBeat
Quora
Medium
Substack
GitHub
Owler
ZoomInfo
Apollo
Clearbit
BuiltWith
Glassdoor
Indeed
AngelList
Better Business

Highest-leverage gaps for Community Impact

  • Wikipedia

    Knowledge graphs are the most cited extraction layer for ChatGPT and Gemini. Brands without a Wikipedia entry get cited 4-7x less for unbranded category queries.

  • Crunchbase

    Crunchbase is the canonical company-data source for LLM enrichment. A missing profile leaves LLMs without firmographics.

  • G2

    G2 reviews feed comparison and 'best X' query responses. Missing G2 presence is a high-leverage gap for B2B SaaS.

  • Capterra

    Capterra listings drive comparison-style answers. Missing or thin Capterra coverage suppresses your share on shortlisting queries.

  • TrustRadius

    Enterprise B2B buyers research here. Feeds comparison-style LLM responses on category queries.

Top Growth Opportunities

Win the "best local news newspapers in 2026" query in answer engines

This is a high-intent buyer query that competitors are winning today. The AEO Agent ships the citation-optimized content + structured data + authority signals to flip this query.

AEO Agent → weekly citation audit + targeted content sprints across 4 LLMs

Publish into Wikipedia (and chained authority sources)

Wikipedia is the single highest-leverage trust node missing for Community Impact. LLMs draw heavily from it for unbranded category recommendations.

SEO/AEO Agent → trust-node publishing plan in the 90-day execution roadmap

No FAQ schema on top product pages

Answer engines extract from FAQ schema 4x more often than from prose. Most B2B sites at this stage don't carry it.

Content + AEO Agent → ship the structural fixes in Sprint 1

What you get

Everything for $10K/mo

One flat price. One team running your SEO + AEO end-to-end.

Trust-node map across 30 authority sources (Wikipedia, G2, Crunchbase, Forbes, HBR, Reddit, YouTube, and more)
5-dimension citation quality scorecard (Authority, Data Structure, Brand Alignment, Freshness, Cross-Link Signals)
LLM visibility report across Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude — 50-100 buyer-intent queries
90-day execution roadmap with week-by-week deliverables
Daily publishing of citation-optimized content (built on the 4-pillar AEO framework)
Trust-node seeding (G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Wikipedia, category-specific authorities)
Structured data implementation (FAQ schema, comparison tables, author bylines)
Weekly re-scan + competitive citation share monitoring
Live dashboard, your own audit URL, ongoing forever

Agencies charge $18K-$20-40K/mo and take up to 8 months to reach this depth. We deliver it immediately, then run it ongoing.

Book intro call · $10K/mo
How It Works

Audit. Publish. Compound.

3 phases focused on one outcome: more Community Impact citations across the answer engines your buyers use.

1

SEO + AEO Audit & Roadmap

You'll know exactly where Community Impact is losing buyers — across Google search and the answer engines they ask before they ever click.

We score 50-100 "local news newspapers" queries across Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Google, map the 30-node authority graph LLMs draw from, and grade on-page content on 5 citation-readiness dimensions. Output: a 90-day publishing plan ranked by lift × effort.

2

Publishing Sprints That Win Both

Buyers start finding Community Impact on Google AND in the answers ChatGPT and Perplexity hand them.

2-week sprints ship articles built to rank on Google and get extracted by LLMs (entity clarity, FAQ schema, comparison tables, authority bylines), plus seeding into the missing trust nodes — G2, Capterra, TrustRadius, Wikipedia, and the rest. Real publishing, not strategy decks.

3

Compounding Share, Every Week

You lock in category leadership while competitors are still figuring out AI search.

Weekly re-scan tracks ranking + citation share vs. the leaders this audit named. New unbranded "local news newspapers" queries get added to the publishing queue automatically. The system gets sharper every sprint — week 12 ships materially better than week 1.

You built a strong local news newspapers. Let's build the AI search engine to match.

Book intro call →